College Media Network

The Observer

The Student Newspaper of Case Western Reserve University
  • Home
  • News
  • Sports
  • Fun Page
  • Opinion
  • Focus
  • About Us
    • Info
    • Staff
  • Archives
    • Sept. 2008 - Present
  • Options
    • Login
    • Register
    • Write to the Editor
    • Syndication
    • Search
  • Advertising

Taking the hit: the case for legalizing pot

Sugar in Your Gas Tank

Tiffany Oliver

Issue date: 9/24/10 Section: Opinion
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1
In case you haven't heard yet, there's a new referendum on California's ballot known as the Regulate, Control, and Tax Cannabis Act of 2010. If approved, the act would legalize marijuana in California. Although I am not a fan of California politics, I commend the Sunshine State for finally realizing that marijuana prohibition is, well, just plain stupid.

Extensive research regarding marijuana has been conducted over the years, and conclusions show that it is no more harmful than alcohol or tobacco. Marijuana legislation was rooted in racism and fear tactics. Political elites such as Henry Anslinger attributed marijuana abuse to Mexican immigrants and sought to portray marijuana in terms of race, much like opium was widely associated with Chinese immigrants.

In short, the government painted marijuana as a dangerous drug that Mexican immigrants used to corrupt innocent Americans. Marijuana was also linked, wrongly, as a cause of violence and crime. "Reefer Madness" stands as the biggest example of fear tactics and misinformation. Additionally, hemp (fiber harvested from non-psychoactive cannabis) posed a threat to the growing paper industry.

A combination of these three misguided reasons ended with the Marijuana Tax Act in 1937, which essentially banned marijuana by only allowing specially licensed vendors to dispense and sell, but no licenses were ever granted. Marijuana prohibition was enacted as a result of myths. These myths have since been disproved, and continuing a policy that is based on myths now known to be incorrect is completely irrational.

The history of marijuana prohibition is rooted in ignorance. Research conducted over the past decades has proven that marijuana is not addictive, does not cause lung cancer, does not cause death by overdose, and has many potential medical benefits. The medical marijuana argument is one that doesn't even need to exist - legalizing medical marijuana should be a given. It does not make sense to prescribe over-abused opiate painkillers to patients when marijuana and THC are legitimate alternatives, serving as natural painkillers.

The problems marijuana bans have posed for the legal system are endless and costly. Judges sending those convicted of marijuana possession to drug rehab has led to a waste of resources. While those who are convicted of possession (personal, so not large amounts) may not be sent to jail, they do end up with permanent criminal records. In short, law enforcement has allocated far too many resources on purging marijuana, a substance that is relatively harmless. Not to mention the millions of dollars the government spends on anti-marijuana commercials (the "Above the Influence" campaign comes to mind) and the billions spent on the War on Drugs, which focuses disproportionately on the least harmful, most common drug.

Opposition to Proposition 19 includes the myth that legalization would cause Americans to become chronic stoners. That argument was used in the 1970s when states such as California and Ohio considered, and enacted, legislation to decriminalize marijuana for personal use. The effect: only a slight increase in use, something in the neighborhood of five percent to eight percent. Such a small increase could not be directly linked to decriminalization, and may be explained by other factors. Another argument commonly cited is that if marijuana were legal, everybody would smoke, which is funny considering that even though cigarettes are legal, only about 25 percent of Americans smoke. And while alcohol is legal, just over 60 percent of Americans drink an average of 4.5 drinks a week.

Just because something is legal doesn't mean everyone is going to do it. Most people who are interested in smoking marijuana already smoke it. Even if there is a moderate amount of people who would all of a sudden try something because it is now legal, there is no basis for assuming that constituency would become regular users, especially since marijuana is not addictive.

The fact that marijuana remains illegal in 2010 baffles me, but then again, not much is new about founding laws on flawed reasoning and scare tactics.

Tiffany Oliver is a third-year history and political science major with a public policy minor. She is a member of the Kappa Alpha Theta women's fraternity.
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 6 of 14

  • Read all 14 comments


posted 9/24/10 @ 3:43 AM EST

Medical marijuana is not good enough for my medical condition. I need Medical Cocaine, Medical Meth and Medical LSD. When I tried those, they got rid of my chronic pain almost immediately and that made me happy. (Continued…)

(8 replies)   Details   Reply to this comment


posted 9/24/10 @ 8:00 AM EST

Informative article.

Just a correction, California is the "Golden State",
Florida is the "Sunshine State".

Yes on Proposition 19!

Details   Reply to this comment


posted 9/24/10 @ 8:42 AM EST

Jesus said to treat other people the way we would want to be treated. I know I wouldn't want my college kid to go to jail with the sexual predators and lose their financial aid, or my parents to have their house stolen by the police, if they used a little marijuana. (Continued…)

Details   Reply to this comment

Leonard Krivitsky, MD

posted 9/27/10 @ 8:58 AM EST

Cannabis is less physically addictive than caffeine, while the so-called "gateway drug" theory is a complete fantasy, and it was just recently called "half-baked" as a result of a scientific study. (Continued…)

Details   Reply to this comment

Leonard Krivitsky, MD

posted 9/28/10 @ 9:14 AM EST

Cannabis is less physically addictive than caffeine, while the so-called "gateway drug" theory is a complete fantasy, and it was just recently called "half-baked" as a result of a scientific study. (Continued…)

Details   Reply to this comment


posted 10/01/10 @ 11:27 AM EST

I'm a strong proponent of Prop 19, but I have to say that often times at Case, we seem to forget about those whose household incomes are lower than a year's tuition. (Continued…)

Details   Reply to this comment

Post a Comment

Issue Summary


  • CWRU adopts American Council of Education guidance
  • CWRU chefs participate in Eat Local Challenge
  • Faculty senate evaluates possibility of core curriculum
  • Marla J. Radvansky, valued CWRU community member, passes away unexpectedly
  • Pilot service program helps community, recognizes students
  • USG Brief


  • GAMEDAY PREVIEW: CWRU vs. Allegheny
  • Hockey opens season tonight
  • Men's Soccer Ends Slump with Win Against Heidelberg
  • Spartans win big on Heritage Night

Fun Page

  • Fun page Solutions 10/1/2010


  • Editorial: Despite minor problems, studying abroad is experience not to be missed
  • Rollover money will benefit all students if given to University Center
  • Take a chill pill - for America
  • The weekend blues


  • A trip to... Shaker Square, Larchmere
  • Cleveland Indie Pop Consortium
  • Cleveland Orchestra opens season with banner Stravinsky, Debussy performance
  • Grog Shop celebrates 18th birthday with national headliners, local DJs
  • Home sweet Homecoming
  • Ingenuity Fest 2010
  • Let's talk about
  • Mortar Board sponsors Tee Time for the Troops
  • Strut your Spartan and get your Gaga on: KATWalk 2010
National College Advertising and Marketing | Privacy Policy (9/9/09) | Terms of Use (9/9/09)
Content Submission Agreement (8/23/07) | Copyright Compliance Policy (4/27/09) | RSS Terms of Use



This Week's Front Page

Download Print Edition PDF