College Media Network

The Observer

The Student Newspaper of Case Western Reserve University
  • Home
  • News
  • Sports
  • Fun Page
  • Opinion
  • Focus
  • About Us
    • Info
    • Staff
  • Archives
    • Sept. 2008 - Present
  • Options
    • Login
    • Register
    • Write to the Editor
    • Syndication
    • Search
  • Advertising

Back away from the camera, Bristol

The Rational Component

Gillian Seaman

Issue date: 9/24/10 Section: Opinion
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1
Even though Bristol Palin doesn't see anything wrong with her famewhoring now, her overexposure on reality television and tabloid covers might have a seriously detrimental effect on her son Tripp later in his life.
Even though Bristol Palin doesn't see anything wrong with her famewhoring now, her overexposure on reality television and tabloid covers might have a seriously detrimental effect on her son Tripp later in his life.
[Click to enlarge]
Given my complete disdain for most reality TV stars, it is somewhat surprising that I feel nothing but sympathy for Bristol Palin. Yes, I feel sorry for Palin, the unwed teenage mother, Us Weekly covergirl, "Dancing with the Stars" contestant, D-list celebrity, reality famewhore. I feel sorry for her because she clearly has no idea how her young son will suffer as a consequence of her actions.

Palin, like any legal adult, is within her full rights to act like an idiot on camera and pimp out her story to any tabloid grocery-store-checkout-aisle magazine that will have her. It is due to people like her that the Case Western Reserve University community's television will be blessed with the 25th season of Real World in 2011 (what a milestone, guys). But what is concerning about Palin's case is the necessary involvement of her son in her antics. Without her son, Bristol would have absolutely nothing to offer to the mass media that currently supports her. She would simply be one of the many anonymous children of another failed vice presidential candidate.

But having her son while in the public eye has enabled Palin to carve out a nice living for herself. She is reportedly paid in the tens of thousands of dollars for her speaking engagements, has appeared on "Secret life of the American Teenager", and has graced the covers of People, In Touch, and Us Weekly.

She essentially owes her monetary success and fame to her son. So what makes Palin any different from the charming former couple Jon and Kate Gosselin or any other reality stars that make a living from their children? Like the Gosselins and Octomom, Bristol would have remained in utter obscurity but has attained public notoriety through her child.

Moreover, the type of publicity that Palin is generating will eventually come back to haunt her son. Children are thoroughly unknowable, cruel little creatures. Is it that far outside the realm of possibility to assume that Tripp, besides being tormented for his name, will also be ridiculed by other kids for his parent's highly publicized (and potentially embarrassing) behavior?

Unfortunately, Palin was not the first to begin this fad of turning odd parenting situations into opportunities for fame, nor will she presumably be the last. Kate Gosselin parlayed her abominable parenting of her twins and sextuplets into a reality TV show and career long before Palin was even pregnant. But it is time that we stop allowing people to use their children as tools to gain fame.

Children should be able to live their lives as freely as possible without the shadow of their parents' actions lingering over them. How possible will it be for children like Tripp and the Gosselins to live normal lives after spending their childhoods being used as their mothers' props?

Let's stop focusing on people like Palin and the Gosselins, who have no discernable talent, and end their 15 minutes of fame prematurely. Resist the urge to purchase the magazines that feature people like these, and do not watch any TV show in which they appear. Ending their unmerited "fame" as quickly as possible will enable them to fade somewhat back into obscurity, and grant their children a chance at normalcy away from the cameras.

Gillian Seaman is a third-year history and political science major. She was raised by a village that failed to do its job.

Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Be the first to comment on this story

Issue Summary


  • Beating the banks with checking and savings accounts
  • Bone health not just for grandparents
  • Saturday Tutoring Program at Church of the Covenant begins 21st year
  • Season of giving begins with Charity Choice 2010
  • Students shack up for Habitat for Humanity
  • USG Brief


  • Another game slips away as CWRU men's soccer falls to Oberlin 2-1
  • Freshly hired swimming head coach to kick off a new era
  • Levey sisters kick up pace for Spartans on the pitch
  • Spartan Spotlight: Kristina Vaci
  • Volleyball wins 8 in a row

Fun Page

  • Fun Page Solutions 9/24/2010


  • Back away from the camera, Bristol
  • Editorial: Thinking beyond our buble
  • State Your Case 09/24/2010
  • Taking the hit: the case for legalizing pot


  • Art for art's sake
  • Artists and other community members chalk up CMA
  • Asia Town's Mooncake Festival offers scant food and performances, far less than expected
  • Communication breakdown
  • Delta Gamma hosts entertaining, philanthropic Anchor Splash
  • First-ever Farm Harvest Festival kicks off tomorrow
  • Serena Maneesh
  • Visitors "Walk All Over Waterloo" in celebration of area revitalization
National College Advertising and Marketing | Privacy Policy (9/9/09) | Terms of Use (9/9/09)
Content Submission Agreement (8/23/07) | Copyright Compliance Policy (4/27/09) | RSS Terms of Use