College Media Network

The Observer

The Student Newspaper of Case Western Reserve University
  • Home
  • News
  • Sports
    • Cross Country
    • Football
    • Soccer
  • Fun Page
  • Opinion
  • Focus
    • Sex and Dating
  • About Us
    • Info
    • Staff
  • Archives
  • Options
    • Login
    • Register
    • Write to the Editor
    • Syndication
    • Advertise
    • Search
  • Blog
/* To add later when they become necessary:
  • Podcasts
  • Classifieds
  • */

SEC referendum deserves impartial consideration

Letters to the Editor

Sarah Bixler

Issue date: 11/20/09 Section: Opinion
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1
I would like to address Kathy Ward's letter, "SEC article presented incomplete argument," in last week's issue. While important in the dialogue about the upcoming SEC referendum, the letter's arguments deserve a response. First, the fact that a few institutions explicitly prohibit paying students with Student Activities Fees is a poor argument. That policy is far from universal. Next, all student wages must be approved by staff. And the variation in hourly wage comes from the fact that the wages are actually stipends. Some Media Board officers could make over $5000 at minimum wage for their time. Even the largest stipend in question is far less than half of that. Stipends prevent wages from becoming a burden.

I appreciate the consideration the SEC members have shown. However, the referendum places only one organization's current policies under attack. It is only natural for Media Board to feel defensive of a policy it believes is necessary. The implication that everyone but Media Board feels wages are inappropriate is out of line. Ms. Ward can only speak for a few friends and colleagues. That no other organization pays students only shows that they found it unnecessary. Even the referendum merely demonstrates that a majority of the SEC would like to bring the matter to students' attention.

Ward also argues that if Media Board positions are paid, everyone in a student organization should be paid. This is not a fair analogy. Not even all students in Media Board organizations are paid - only those with the largest responsibilities, whose wages are at risk if they do not complete their work on schedule. And, again, the wages are stipends for a reason.

Finally, the underlying question: why does Media Board pay officers? Media organizations on campus are like businesses. They rely on constant dedication to meet deadlines and produce a product. If those deadlines are not met, there is no magazine, TV channel, etc. Student leaders put in a huge commitment across campus, but the nature of the responsibility is different. In addition, Media Board does not have the same prestige, power in policy, or universal attraction as other SEC members. Without these important recruiting and motivating factors, it is often forced to rely on minimal financial incentives to preserve and further its contributions to campus. Please give this referendum fair consideration. If the proposed changes go into effect, I'm sure Media Board will do its best to maintain quality, but that is all I can say.
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Be the first to comment on this story

In This Issue


  • Can you name this place?
  • Class inspires students to start CSEC
  • CWRU's Eco-Party
  • Eyewitness: Editor-in-chief for a day
  • Have you heard about Grupo de Capoeira?
  • Spectrum's sixth annual Drag Ball takes place Saturday
  • The college student's guide to credit cards - Part 3
  • USG creates transparency committee to improve communication
  • USG Brief


  • Colts and Saints are NFL's teams to beat
  • Five thoughts on the '09 season
  • Football's success is built on this senior class
  • Men win Veale Classic
  • Spartan Spotlight: Erin Hollinger
  • Spartans cap perfect 10-0 regular season
  • Spartans get first-ever win against B-W
  • Women's basketball drops lidlifter

Fun Page

  • Combo Scramble Solution
  • Crossword Solution
  • Sudoku Solutions


  • Discriminating against smokers again
  • Editorial: CWRU athletics' accomplishments praiseworthy
  • It takes two to have unsafe sex
  • Nothing much humane about humanity
  • SEC referendum deserves impartial consideration
  • The gap year: volunteering
  • Where is your favorite campus spot to chill, nap or relax?


  • American Music Masters Series wraps up week with Janis Joplin tribute
  • CIM graduate returns to Cleveland with jazz, cabaret aspirations
  • Delta Gamma swims for sight
  • Green is the new black: eco-friendly fashion
  • Hitting the spot: Atlas Sound
  • Holiday season with a cranberry craze
  • Latest installment in popular Call of Duty series improves on already high quality franchise
  • Sigma Psi hosts Mr. CWRU competition to benefit local communities
  • Starving Student: simple grub
  • The Buzz

Cross Country

  • Women finish third in region, qualify for nationals


  • Bracket Breakdown
  • Football Gameday: Case vs. Trine

Sex and Dating

  • Passive pregnancy prevention plan


  • Crooks UAA's Coach of the Year
National College Advertising and Marketing | Privacy Policy (9/9/09) | Terms of Use (9/9/09)
Content Submission Agreement (8/23/07) | Copyright Compliance Policy (4/27/09) | RSS Terms of Use



This Week's Front Page

Download Print Edition PDF